Showing posts with label acting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label acting. Show all posts

Sunday, March 4, 2018

2018 Oscars

As I have said before I am one of those masochists who watches the Oscars every year, start to finish. Since the show is on tonight, I thought I would share my predictions and preferences:
Best Picture:


This is a tough one. I admired the point of view presentation on the land, sea, and air of the various characters in Dunkirk. I also thought the script and acting made Lady Bird very believable. Phantom Thread was intriguing as it explored an Oedipal Daniel Day-Lewis and his “sick” relationship with his girlfriend/model/muse. I also would have expanded the list to add the satirical  I, Tonya and a film that perfectly blended humor and drama, The Big Sick. But I think the contest is really between Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri and The Shape of Water. Three Billboards is a sort of metaphor for the polarized nation in which we now live, and has won many of the pre-Oscar awards. But, it has the disadvantage of not having its director named under the Best Director category, and the only films to have won given that situation that I recall are Driving Miss Daisy and more recently Argo. The Shape of Water is a wonderfully visual fairy tale that deals with the treatment of those who do not fit in with mainstream (“stream” being the operative word here) society. However, fantasy, horror, and science fiction films, although nominated, don't get chosen for best picture (the notable exception is The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King). Another exception to the rule may occur this year, since the Producers Guild awarded its prize to The Shape of Water.


Prediction:  The Shape of Water
Preference: The Shape of Water


Best Actress:


The most competitive category this year, in my opinion. Margot Robbie somehow had me rooting for her despite Tonya Harding’s negative reputation. Sally Hawkins said a great deal with her face and body movements in an almost wordless role. Frances McDormand is one of my favorite actresses, and here she shows a nasty side of a character that we would expect to empathize with. If there is a weak entry here it is Meryl Streep, not because her performance should not to be praised, but the role simply doesn’t offer the range this great actress is capable of exhibiting. Then there is the totally believable performance of Saoirse Ronan in Lady Bird. There are so many notes to play in portraying this young woman, and Ronan is spot on as she hits every one of them.


Prediction: Frances McDormand
Preference: Saoirse Ronan


Best Actor:


It would be something if Daniel Day-Lewis took home his fourth Oscar in a lead role as Reynolds Woodcock, joining Katharine Hepburn in that accomplishment, in supposedly his last film performance (he quit before, so never say never). He is great in Phantom Thread, as he shows vulnerability and contempt and many other emotions with relatively little dialogue (as opposed to his talky roles in There Will be Blood and Lincoln).  But this is Gary Oldman’s year. He is a chameleon, and is hard to recognize off screen because of how different he looks and acts in each role (Darkest Hour should also get the best make-up award). If you haven’t seen him in his should have been Oscar-nominated performance in The Contender and his nominated role in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, give yourself a treat and check those movies out. He brings to us a self-indulgent, bossy, passionate, and powerful Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour.


Prediction: Gary Oldman
Preference: Gary Oldman
Best Supporting Actress:


Again, we have a strong field here. But, it appears to come down to a battle between two unlikable mothers. Laurie Metcalf’s Marion McPherson at least seems to care about her daughter in Lady Bird, but she is so critical of her that she does more harm than good in trying to prepare her for life. But, if you want to see a true malicious mama, look no further than Allison Janney’s LaVonna Golden (a person who definitely does not live up to her name) in I, Tonya. She may have saved her waitressing wages for Tonya to get lessons and says she had to be tough to get her daughter to excel at skating, but she is downright mean. She is a selfish sadist who relishes her nastiness a little too much. One might think that a character needs to have more facets today to win an Oscar, but Janney’s performance is so fierce that its one note blasts away the others in this category.


Prediction: Allison Janney
Preference: Allison Janney


Best Supporting Actor:


A film that should have received more Oscar recognition is The Florida Project, a movie about the damage caused by poverty and the resilience of children who try to enjoy life even when parents let them down. At least Willem Dafoe is nominated here, and he gives a wonderfully understated performance. Sam Rockwell is the favorite for Three Billboards, having won all of the early awards. But, I have a fondness for Richard Jenkins, who was previously nominated in The Visitor, and has consistently given great portrayals in many films, including Eat Pray Love, and in his continuing role in the HBO series Six Feet Under. His portrait of an emotionally tortured gay man in The Shape of Water is exceptionally moving.


Prediction: Sam Rockwell
Preference: Richard Jenkins
Cinematography:


Dunkirk is all-encompassing, but Dan Laustsen’s work in The Shape of Water conjures up the unreal feel of this imaginary story, and the darkness of some of the evil deeds committed by an oppressive environment. I feel that Phantom Thread was unfairly left out of this competition. It was revelatory in how it focused on the smallest of items, the characters, and their surroundings. An action film should not be a prerequisite for recognizing great photography.


Prediction: The Shape of Water
Preference: The Shape of Water


Film Editing:


Here, too, I think it’s between Dunkirk and The Shape of Water. Again, Phantom Thread was left off the list despite precise cutting between images which reflected its protagonist’s perfectionistic splicing and meshing of fabrics.


Prediction: The Shape of Water
Preference: The Shape of Water


Best Original Screenplay:


Strong group of nominees. The Screenwriters Guild awarded its prize to Get Out. I’ll admit it is pretty good, turning phony liberals into modern slave owners, but I may have enjoyed The Big Sick more than any other movie this past year. It humorously, sometimes daringly so, dealt with religion, family and illness in a way that we all can relate to.


Prediction: Get Out
Preference: The Big Sick
Best Adapted Screenplay:


I have to admit I haven’t read the source material for the nominated films, so I have no right to comment on how well the writers used the original stories. The Screenwriters Guild picked Call Me by Your Name, and I do think that this is a caring and thoughtful story about a young man who is discovering his sexuality at a time when it was dangerous for a gay person to exit the closet. He has a brilliant and passionate mentor in his father’s male research assistant. (It is appropriate that they study Greek and Roman statuary which exalt the male form). I do not think that this script would have been so successful without the very good performances of the actors. I did feel that Armie Hammer (who did a great job) was too old for the role and made his sexual relationship with the considerably younger Timothee Chalamet a bit icky for me. But it didn’t bother others I spoke with, so maybe it’s just me. However, the screenplay of Mudbound is brilliant in the way it uses multiple narrators and poetic language.


Prediction:  Call Me by Your Name
Preference: Mudbound
Best Director:


Again, we have a terrific group of artists. I think Jordan Peele did an excellent job in his directorial debut. His angled close-ups and creepy hallucinogenic shots of Daniel Kaluuya being hypnotized were very effective. I would not mind at all if Greta Gerwig got the nod here, not only because of the great work she did, but to help make up for all of the admissions of women in the past in this category. But, I do believe Directors Guild winner Guillermo del Toro is the person to beat. He combined mesmerizing visuals with an imaginative story and accomplished acting into a seamless, deeply affecting movie.


Prediction: Guillermo del Toro
Preference: Guillermo del Toro

I’ll stop there. I’m already getting sleepy thinking about the numerous categories and how long the show will last. The next film to be analyzed is Frozen River.

Sunday, April 10, 2016

Mulholland Dr.

SPOILER ALERT! The plot of the movie will be discussed.


When I saw director David Lynch when he visited the Bryn Mawr Film Institute he spoke of the days he lived in my hometown, Philadelphia. He said the ugliness, the squalor there was sort of scary, disturbing. He also implied that because of those seemingly negative qualities that the city was wonderful. This impression may seem like a paradox, but for Lynch the darker side of life, the underbelly of the human psyche, was what fascinated him as an artist. It is similar to how the young boy in the movie American Beauty sees beauty in a dead bird or in paper trash swirling in the wind. In Lynch’s films, such as Blue Velvet, which I have written about previously, and in the television show Twin Peaks, the bizarre, the threatening part of life coexists with what appears to be the acceptable aspect of existence. But that “normal” world seems less real than one would expect, almost phony, and certainly less interesting, to the artist, and usually to the audience, than its counterpart.
 In Mulholland Dr., which Lynch wrote as well as directed, he again explores two different worlds, but here he is presenting two different stories in one film with each one having his disturbing, surreal elements because they spring from the main character’s personal experiences. To understand the enigmatic narrative, we must first understand what is happening. Then, we can delve into what Lynch may be trying to say through these stories. The best way to analyze the movie is to see the much longer first part of the film as a wish-fulfillment dream of the main character based on the short second part’s real world experiences, many of which are told in flashback. However, this may be too simplistic, which I will point out later.
The movie begins with a surreal sequence of young people dancing to jitterbug music against a bright blue background, as the figures and their shadows vary in size. It also foretells the type of film which is being shot later in the story. Superimposed over these images are shots of a smiling Betty (Naomi Watts). This unrealistic opening suggests the stream-of-consciousness of a dream. We also get a quick shot of someone in a bed with a pillow, which implies that we may be entering someone’s dream state. The upbeat, although strange, start segues to a drive at night with contrasting ominous music and the car light lit Mulholland Dr. street sign. The car doing the lighting stops, and the dark-haired woman in the back says that this is not where they should be stopping. At gunpoint, she is told to get out by one man, and another opens the car door. Rowdy, recklessly driven cars slam into the parked car, killing the men. The woman survives, and staggers away. She sneaks into the apartment of a woman who is leaving on a trip so she can sleep.



Betty lands at the Los Angeles airport, and we learn that she is an aspiring actress. She is all bubbly and in awe of being in LA. She met an elderly couple on the plane, and they hit it off. They seem sweet and encouraging. But, as we see them drive away in a cab, their smiles are grotesquely broad, and they bare too much teeth, which suggests a bit of nightmare invading Betty’s happy dream-come-true of being in LA. Coco (Anne Miller), who is the manager of the apartment complex where Betty’s actress Aunt Ruth (Maya Bond) resides, escorts Betty to her aunt’s home. The actress relative is on location shooting a film. The apartment is where the dark-haired woman is crashing. Betty finds her naked in the shower, which hints at their eventual sexual relationship. The woman has amnesia, so she says her name is Rita (Laura Elena Harring) after seeing the poster of the Rita Hayworth film Gilda hanging in the apartment. Rita has a handbag that contains a large sum of money and a triangular-shaped blue key.



 At a Winkie's restaurant, Dan (Patrick Fischler) tells Herb (Michael Cooke) about a frightening dream (a dream within Betty’s dream which pretends to be reality?) he has had involving a scary man living behind the dumpsters at the rear of this particular restaurant. Here again, we have a nightmare in counterpoint to the hopeful actress dream of Betty. Dan wants to look in the back so he can dispel his fear by proving that the creature does not exist. When they go to investigate, a shaggy-haired dark-skinned man with a long, pointed nose appears. Dan collapses. But, Herb only acknowledges his concern for his friend. Did he see the dark man, or was this a nightmare demon Dan hallucinates? At another point, Betty says, “I’m in a dream place,” when speaking about LA. So, the film often alerts the audience to the fact that what they are seeing may not be real.
Director Adam Kesher (Justin Theroux) has a meeting with studio big shots and gangster types, the Castigliani brothers. One of them, played by the film’s composer Angelo Badalamenti, spits out what to him is unacceptable espresso onto a napkin. The brothers throw a head shot of an actress by the name of Camilla Rhodes (Melissa George) at the studio men because she is the one that they want as the lead in Kesher’s new movie. They keep saying, “This is the girl.” We see another bigger shot (ironically played by dwarf-sized Michael J. Anderson) in a room with a glass window who is the puppeteer pulling the studio strings. Kesher storms out and smashes the Castigliani’s car windshield. He returns home and finds his wife in bed with the pool guy, who says to him, “Just forget you even saw it. It’s better that way.” This remark echoes what is happening to Rita, who may be better off not knowing about the shady men who died at the car crash and the money in the handbag. Kesher stays at a sleazy hotel. The manager tells him that men showed up to say that Kesher’s credit cards can’t be used and he is broke. He is told to meet a “cowboy” (Lafayette Montgomery) at a ranch, who tells him that he has to pick Camilla for the role. Another unreal incident is how did these men know where Kesher escaped to, since he only paid in cash for the room?

In an unreal coincidence, Betty and Rita go to the same Winkie’s as did Dan and Herb. Betty, using the pay phone outside the restaurant, verifies that there was an accident on Mulholland Dr. While being served coffee at the diner, Rita notices that the waitress’ name is Diane, which reminds her that she knew a woman named Diane Selwyn. We also have a scene where an inept hit-man, Joe (Mark Pellegrino) kills a man for a black address book. Since they talk about a car accident, we know that these men are associated with the criminals involved with Rita. This impression is confirmed when Joe tells a prostitute to be on the lookout for the missing brunette. When Betty and Rita call Diane Selwyn’s number, Rita realizes it is not her, but she says she knows the voice. One of the neighbors at the apartment complex, Louise Bonner (Lee Grant), is clairvoyant according to Coco. Bonner says to Betty, “that’s not your name,” and advises her to get rid of Rita. This scene fits in with the dream nature of this part, possibly showing how the nightmare of reality is trying to intrude into Betty’s wish-fulfillment dream state.
Betty’s aunt set her up for an audition. She runs through the lines with Rita, and the two laugh at the bad dialogue. Some of her lines include saying how she hates the person she is talking to, and threatening to kill the other person in the scene. She says these words to Rita, which is an omen of what will happen in the second part of the movie. But, when Betty plays the scene at the studio, she changes the feel of the scene, and delivers a steamy, completely mesmerizing performance. The female casting director at the audition says that the film for which she read will never happen and takes her to see Kesher, who is auditioning women for his movie, The Sylvia North Story. Betty must leave to go with Rita to find Diane Selwyn. Camilla Rhodes auditions, and Kesher reluctantly repeats what he has been told to say: “This is the girl.”
 Betty and Rita go the what they believe is Diane’s apartment. They see men lurking about the area. They find the woman’s neighbor there, who tells them they switched apartments. We get a sniff of subtext here from the neighbor’s hurt and angry attitude that she and Diane may have been involved, which foreshadows the relationship between Betty and Rita. Betty enters Diane’s place through an open window, and lets Rita in. They find Diane’s decomposing corpse inside. Did the criminals associated with Rita’s past kill her, and were waiting for Rita to show up? Rita believes so, and goes back to Betty’s place to cut her hair. Betty finishes cutting her hair, and gives Rita a short blonde wig. They stand next to each other staring into a mirror. They look similar. It is interesting that they later make love, as if Betty is trying to make Rita into her own image, and may need to feel love for herself.

In the middle of the night, Rita, in a dream, starts to speak Spanish, and calls out the word, “Silencio.” She remembers a theater by that name and convinces Betty to go with her to that place. It is here where this world becomes more dream-like. The master of ceremonies there says everything at the theater is a recording, an illusion, as musicians pretend to play music, and a woman appears to be singing, but is not. At one point, the emcee disappears at the front of the stage. Betty reaches into her bag and a blue box magically appears there. We had the blue background of the opening, the blue key, and now this blue item, the coincidences lending themselves to the surreal nature of this world. When the women return to the apartment, Betty mysteriously disappears from the bedroom, just as the emcee had done. Is she waking up, and thus exiting her dream? Rita fits the triangular-shaped key into the box, and opens it. It seems as if her reality is sucked into the box, which drops onto the floor of Aunt Ruth’s bedroom, who is now there as if none of what preceded took place. However, the woman heard the sound of the box dropping, but finds nothing when she enters the room.
We then have what seems like a transition between Betty’s dream and a waking state. We see Diane’s bedroom with the corpse, but the image alternates with one of an alive woman in the bed. There is a vision of the Cowboy who says it’s time to wake up. Betty is now Diane Selwyn, in the apartment we saw in Betty’s dream. In the first part, after Rita dons the blonde wig, Betty says to her, “You look like someone else,” which shows the real world intruding in subliminally, telling Betty that Rita is not who she seems. The neighbor we also saw in the first part appears, collecting things from her former apartment, and she tells Diane that two policemen had been around, looking for her. We see a normal-shaped blue key sitting on the coffee table. Diane, even though awake, hallucinates that Rita is in her apartment, but her name is Camilla Rhodes. So, we know how that name showed up in her dream. But, then we see this Camilla half-naked on the couch, and the similarly topless Diane practically forcing herself on her, as Camilla tells her she must stop. The blue key is no longer on the table, so what follows is a flashback from here until the very end which shows most of the elements that appeared in the first part rearranged.
 Camilla and Diane are actresses, and they auditioned for Kesher’s movie, The Sylvia North Story, which was Kesher’s film in the first part, too. The two women became lovers. However, Camilla broke it off, which devastated Diane. Camilla became involved with Kesher. Camilla invites Diane to a party, and has a car pick her up. The driver stops where Rita did in the first part, and now it is Diane who says, “this is not where we are supposed to stop,” the words Rita used. Camilla appears and leads her up to the party. We see a man dressed like a cowboy, who turns into the western fellow of the first part. We also see a person drinking coffee who morphs into the espresso-sipping gangster brother in the dream. It is here where she meets Coco, who is really Kesher’s mother. Diane, in answer to some questions, states she had an aunt, who in this story died, and left her some money. Diane also says she won a jitterbug contest, which explains why we have young people doing that dance at the beginning of the dream. Kesher, talking about his divorce, laughingly says his ex-wife got the pool guy, while the director got the pool, which refers to the infidelity scene in the dream. Camilla then humiliates Diane by kissing a girl who showed up in the dream as Camilla Rhodes in the first part. It makes sense that in the dream she plays Camilla, the woman who gets the part. It also allowed Betty in the dream to keep Camilla in the form of Rita, but wipe her past clean with amnesia so Betty could help her, make her dependent on her, and fall in love with her.
In the next flashback, Diane meets with Joe, the hit-man, at Winkie’s, where she sees the person she dreams as Dan. The waitress’ name here is Betty, which is the name Diane uses for herself in the dream story of the first part. She is there to hire Joe to kill Camilla. She, like the gangsters, presents a headshot of an actress, in this case the real Camilla, and she, in this world, says the words, “This is the girl.” Joe says confirmation of the hit will be signaled by the appearance of the blue key he holds up in front of her. She asks what does it open? Joe just laughs. Now, this world, too, becomes surreal. We see the scary man behind the dumpsters, and he holds the blue box. It drops to his feet, as the box dropped at the end of the dream to the floor. We see the old couple who appeared as Betty’s flight friends, as tiny creatures scurrying away from the box. Is Diane imagining this part, psychotically answering her own question about the key? We are back in Diane’s apartment again, and the blue key is again on the table, signaling the end of the flashbacks which supplied her dream. We hear knocking at the door by the policemen possibly investigating Camilla’s murder, the light of the police car flashing in the background. Is this scene real, or more hallucinations on Diane’s part, brought on by paranoia? She is possibly driven insane with guilt about the killing of Camilla. She imagines the elderly couple, full-sized now, laughingly assaulting her. She pulls out a gun and shoots herself. She is now dead on the bed, just the way Diane was found in the dream. Did Diane as Betty foresee her own death?
So, is it that straight second part-is the reality-first-part-is-the-dream the only way to understand what happens? Perhaps. Maybe the scene in the second part which shows the scary man with the box is not part of Diane’s story, since she doesn’t really experience him, as she does the other parts that are the bases for the dream of the first part. Maybe Lynch is referring to the demons that lurk in all of our minds, not just in Diane’s suffering state. After Diane dies, we, the audience, see a surreal smoky mist rising from the bed. If Diane is now dead, and this is the “real” world, she cannot be experiencing this phenomena, or imagining it. After her death, we, not Diane or Betty, go back to the Silencio theater, which did not appear in the second part, the only suggestion for its existence in part one is Kesher speaking Spanish at the party. We see a glowing microphone stand, and the woman in the balcony we saw in the dream, who instead of saying the end, utters the word, “Silencio.”
I think Lynch is talking about the movie-making process. He has his main characters, and some supporting ones, be in the acting profession. We see the Hollywood sign twice in the film. We have auditions. Lynch may be satirizing the studios who try to manipulate the artist’s vision when he deals with the movie executives caving to disreputable interests, interfering with the director’s motion picture. At that Bryn Mawr Film Institute visit, Lynch said his primary advice to new filmmakers was to get final cut to protect their work. Movies spring from imagination, and involve the imaginations of the audience. In the first section, Betty, when suggesting they call the police to find out about the possible accident, says to Rita, “We’ll pretend to be someone else,” which is what actors do, and which we do as we are sucked into the movie’s world, much as we are sucked into the blue box in this film. Of course, this imaginative pretending to be someone else refers to how the two characters are different people in the two stories. But, it also points to how a director can take the same actresses and have them become different people depending on how you tell the story. Rita taking the name of an actress emphasizes the way people reinvent themselves in the dream world of film. Betty uses the same overwrought words of the script at her audition, but through art, transforms them into something moving. At Silencio, the emcee (the director?) tells the audience in the theater, and the audience watching the movie (also in a theater), that what we are seeing is not really happening in front of them. It is a recording, an illusion, of reality. But, Betty and Rita, in a theater, as are we, are still moved by the woman’s dubbed singing of the Spanish version of Roy Orbison’s “Crying,” as are we. That emotional moment is reality for us.

“Rhodes” is Camilla’s last name in the film. Mulholland Dr. is a road. When you take a ride with David Lynch down a cinematic road, that trip takes many imaginative turns.

The next film is Invasion of the Body Snatchers.