SPOILER ALERT! The plot of
the movie will be discussed.
I
hope you don’t have doubts about the length of this post. But, there is a lot
going on in this movie. The title of this 2008 film says it all. John Patrick
Shanley, who directed the movie and adapted his Pulitzer Prize-winning play for
the screen, said he hoped that the audience would “transcend” the mystery
aspect of the story and think about how does one act in a world of uncertainty
to know how to benefit fellow human beings. To provide definitive answers to
the questions raised in this story would defeat the purpose of the writing of
it. Thus, as soon as we think we have the characters figured out they provide a
twist to their personalities that cause us to shift our conclusions.
The
tale takes place in 1964 in an Italian/Irish Roman Catholic neighborhood in the
Bronx. Donald is an altar boy worried that he looks fat in his church garments;
he is insecure about his appearance. Could he possibly doubt his attractiveness
to the celebrator of the mass, Father Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman)? In the
church, Flynn says the topic of his sermon is “Doubt.” He talks about how the
assassination in the prior year of President John F. Kennedy, a catholic, could
cause people to have doubts about what they believe. But, Flynn says, they were
all sharing the tragedy together, so there was comradeship in the loss. People
were not alone. And, he says, even individual everyday doubts are shared by all
people, so no one should feel alone in these questioning times. He says, “Doubt
can be a bond as powerful and sustaining as certainty. When you are lost, you
are not alone.”
To
sanction doubt is an unusual argument to make for a sermon in a church,
especially a catholic one (this I know from personal experience), since
possibly one of the main purposes of religion is to provide the relief of absolute
certainty as to what to believe and how to live, thus warding off the anguish
of agonizing over varying answers to disturbing questions. After all, didn’t
Christ chastise his “Doubting Thomas?” But, the people of this country, and
especially the catholic citizens, had the security of their world shattered by
the violent loss of their beloved leader, the first catholic president of the
United States. So, given the context, the topic of the sermon may be
appropriate.
Not
so for Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep, in, my opinion, her best performance),
the principal (of principles?) of the school associated with this church. She
is the queen of certainty here. And, for certainty to continue to reign there
is no room for doubt. She cannot exist in insecurity, nor, in her opinion, can
the Catholic Church. She is the Christian cop when it comes to being vigilant
in maintaining adherence to the rules of her religion, thus preventing any
drifting into unsettling, uncharted waters. She patrols the pews during mass,
making sure all the children do not talk or snooze, which can lead to straying
away from the well-worn religious path into a forest of multiple routes
determined individually. She criticizes Sister James (Amy Adams) because she
finds a ballpoint pen in the latter’s class. These writing devices indicate selfish
laziness, and, thus, penmanship overall has declined. Cough drops are
considered by her to be “candy,” which means children using them indulge their
physical appetites, leading to uncontrollable, and thus, less certain, patterns
of behavior. Later, she condemns Father Flynn for liking his tea very sweet and
using a ballpoint pen. She gives a chastising look at Sister James for spitting
out a piece of unsavory meat at dinner. To her, food is for nourishment, not
for enjoyment, which leads to self-indulgence, elevating the individual above
its place in the scheme of things. To her these tendencies represent change,
and change allows too many variables that can undermine reassuring certainty in
a belief system.
There
are numerous references to wind in the story, and in this case, it is the winds
of change that Sister Aloysius fears. She does not like windows open in Sister
James’ classroom or in her office, allowing the wind to blow in. She tells the
handyman after a wind-blown large branch caused a sister to fall that “The wind
has changed,” and for her, the changes are not for the better. A wind gust
spins leaves around Sister Aloysius after her confrontation with Mrs. Miller
who astounds the sister with her tolerance of possible inappropriate behavior
between her son and Father Flynn. The wind represents something uncontrollable.
It can knock your hat off, exposing you to what you don’t want to see. Streep
said that to emphasize her character’s narrow-mindedness, she scrunched her bonnet,
making it look as if she had blinders on. Amy Adams said that the nuns she
talked with in preparation for her role had their own individual ways of tying
on their rosaries, but each said their own way was the right way. This anecdote
is an indication that people seek security in certainties to avoid being unsure
of what to do, even though the reality indicates that there are no absolute
right and wrong ways to act.
Sister James represents
innocence in the film. She can’t believe that one of her students, William
London (Michael Roukis), would give himself a nosebleed, just to get out of
class. She wants to believe Father Flynn is innocent of any crimes. She does
not like to be cynical of human behavior, like Sister Aloysius, who urges her
to use a picture of the Pope on the blackboard, not for religious inspiration,
but to use the glass covering to spy on the class as she writes with her chalk.
(The principal would be right at home in the NSA). Aloysius asked the nuns to
be on alert after Father Flynn’s sermon on doubt, because it made him seem
suspicious. Sister James says, “It is unsettling to look at people with
suspicion. I feel less close to God.” To which, Sister Aloysius says, “When you
take a step to address wrongdoing, you are taking a step away from God. But, in
his service.” Aloysius’ statement sounds like we should act for the greater
good. But, it can also mean the ends justify the use of some unscrupulous means,
as we witness later. Aloysius says her certainty comes from her “experience”
and that she “knows” people. But, knowing, in the biblical sense, is carnal,
sinful, and thus, ironically, Sister Aloysius is a fallen woman who immerses
herself in the muck of the world to clean it up, but who cannot come out
unstained. Perhaps that is why she sees, with darting eyes, sin everywhere
undermining the solidity of her belief system. She even says that the song
“Frosty the Snowman” fosters a pagan belief in magic.
It
is also ironic that she enters St. James’ classroom just as the line from
Franklin Roosevelt about having nothing to fear but fear itself is discussed.
Sister James later tells her that all the students are terrified of the
principal, whose response is, “Yes, that’s how it works.” One response to that
would be, how does what work? Fascism works that way, establishing a world
totally without doubt, but also without the freedom to question anything, too.
Roosevelt was trying to urge people to overcome fear, not to give into its
paralysis of the human spirit.
But, we are also shown that
Sister Aloysius’ realistic outlook about the unholy nature of people can be
true. William London does give himself a nosebleed so he can escape school, and
indulge in underage cigarette smoking. He sneaks over to a girl’s desk when the
teacher is facing the blackboard, and he is rude to other students. Which brings
us to the suspicions concerning Father Flynn. After the sermon at the beginning
of the movie, Donald tells Flynn that he would like to become a priest. The
Father gives him a curious gift which is a miniature ballerina that spins as a
tiny mirror is placed next to the dancer. Is this sort of effeminate gift
hinting at a homosexual subtext? Since it appears to be a trick the way the toy
works, does it imply Flynn is tricking the boy, grooming him for seduction? We
have no proof, but Shanley plants doubts about the priest’s intentions, which
the audience is susceptible to given the recent investigations exposing the
Catholic Church’s harboring of pedophiles. Also, Flynn hesitates while staring
at a stain glass window with an eye in it looking down at him. Does he feel
that the eye of God sees what he is and is judging him? The student William
flinches and pulls away from Flynn when he touches the boy to see if the
child’s hands are dirty. The audience sees him react the same way at the gym
where Flynn coaches basketball and lectures the students on keeping their
fingernails clean. Is William’s reaction because he is a problem kid who
doesn’t like the Father’s signaling him out? Father Flynn says he likes to keep
his nails a little long, and later, Sister Aloysius tells him to cut his nails.
Demons and vampires have been depicted as having long fingernails resembling
talons. Are we to believe Flynn to be demonic? When the classmates ask Flynn
about a girl turning down a boy’s invitation to the dance, the Father says that
when all the girls turn you down, you become a priest. William’s reaction is a
turning away and a shaking of the head. Did Flynn make advances on William and
that is why he cringes at his touch? Does he scoff at his joke because he knows
the man prefers young boys? Later, when Flynn says goodbye to the parishioners,
William smiles; is he happy that this threat is gone? Or, is he glad that he
doesn’t have to deal with the priest pointing out his shortcomings?
Sister
Aloysius saw William’s initial pulling away, and along with the “Doubt” sermon
believes Flynn is guilty of being a pederast. Again, she tells Sister James
that she has experience coming across this perversion before. Because she told
the nuns to observe anything suspicious, Sister James notes that Donald was
called into the rectory to meet with Father Flynn, and was upset when he came
back to class. He put his head down on the desk, and there was alcohol on his
breath. Later, she saw Flynn put Donald’s undershirt in the boy’s locker. She
reluctantly reports her observations to the principal.
Sister
Aloysius is now convinced that Flynn is a predator. She sets up a bogus meeting
about the Christmas pageant to trap him. She says because Donald is the only
African American boy in the school, he should not be exhibited too much in the
show, nor hidden. Flynn says he should be treated like all the other students,
but Aloysius says Flynn already signaled him out for special treatment by
calling for him to go to the rectory. Sister Aloysius turns the meeting into an
interrogation. She opens the blinds so that the sunlight shines onto Flynn’s
face like a bright lamp used in the grilling of a suspect. (She doesn’t like it
when, as Sister James later questions her motives, one of her ceiling lights
burns out. She replaces the bulb later, which goes out again. It’s as if she
doesn’t want any dimness which would symbolize uncertainty in her moral
vision). She has Sister James relate her observations. Flynn says that Donald
became inebriated drinking the sacramental wine. It is ironic that the wine is
supposed to represent Christ’s blood used to nourish souls, but here was used
for what someone like Aloysius would consider the satisfaction of a baser
appetite. Flynn felt compassion for the boy, and didn’t want to expose him
which would lead to him being dismissed as an altar boy, which is what must now
happen. He says the boy left his undershirt behind and Flynn did not want to
cause him further embarrassment so he dropped off the piece of clothing.
Sister
James is relieved by Father Flynn’s explanation, returning her to what Aloysius
calls her innocent “simplicity.” For Aloysius, humans brought about their
banishment from that simplicity of not knowing sin in the Garden of Eden, and
now we have to deal with it. But, in a meeting, appropriately in the church’s
garden, Father Flynn tells Sister James to hold onto her purity. She deals with
innocent children and the only way to respond to them is with love and
kindness. He says that Donald was a boy in trouble, and he was just trying to
show the boy compassion. He tells her, obviously referring to Aloysius’ deep
immersion in the fallen world, that “There are people who go after your
humanity, Sister, that tell you that the light in your heart is a weakness.
Don’t believe it. It is an old tactic of cruel people who kill kindness in the
name of virtue.” This sounds like an indictment of Aloysius’ statement about
stepping away from God to do his service. Later, Sister James observes students
deliberately banging into Donald, his books and Flynn’s gift dashed to the
floor. Father Flynn helps the boy gather up his belongings, and the priest
gives him a long hug. Caught between her own innocence and Sister Aloysius’
suspicious nature, she can view this scene as either an act of generosity or
one of depravity. And, so can we.
Sister
Aloysius is not satisfied with Flynn’s explanation, and meets with Donald’s
mother to get more information. There are a few surprises about the nun in
these scenes. When Mrs. Miller (Viola Davis) enters, she finds Sister Aloysius
listening to a transistor radio she confiscated from a boy in Sister James’
class. She says she is addicted to it, an unusual admission from someone who is
against change, even the invention of the ballpoint pen. However, she is not so
heretical that she listens to music, only to the news stories. She also
surprises Mrs. Miller by telling her that she was married before becoming a
nun. So, the principal, despite her belief that those in the religious orders should
be considered to be on a separate level from the lay people, actually is not
that different from them. She champions against giving into human appetites,
yet has been sexually intimate in her past. But, then again, she said that her
“experience” allows her to understand transgressors.
However,
she does not comprehend Mrs. Miller’s attitude of nonintervention when she
tells her that that the relationship between Father Flynn and her son is
inappropriate. The mother says she is grateful the priest looked out for her boy
when he was caught drinking the wine. When Aloysius says that Flynn is the kind
of man that chases boys, the mother says that some boys want to be caught. She says
that her husband beats Donald because of his “nature.” We now understand that
Donald has gay tendencies, and in 1964, most considered this an abomination.
His mother voices a modern, anti-Catholic Church, belief when she says “You
can’t hold a child responsible for what God gave him to be.” Mrs. Miller sent
her boy to the catholic school to get him away from harassment at the public
school and only wants him to graduate in June when he can go to a good high
school. She tells the Sister that he needs a man to care for her son. Of
course, Aloysius says it can’t be in that way. When the principal threatens to
remove Donald from the school, the mother tells the nun that if the situation
becomes public, Donald will suffer because his father will kill him with his
beatings. Mrs. Miller hits at Aloysius’ need for certainty about the crime of
which she is convinced in the absence of concrete evidence. Concerning the true
nature of the relationship between the priest and her son she asks, “Why do you
have to know something like that when you don’t?” Here, being in doubt will be
the kinder way to go, at least for her boy. We do see Sister Aloysius’
compassion here, because she is appalled that the father beats his son. She
sees the need to protect him.
The
scenes with Mrs. Miller also emphasize the gender issue brought up in the film.
The mother is known only as “Mrs. Miller,” showing her subservient status in
the society. She understands the reality of the male-dominated world when she
says that the nun will not be able to win against the man in a robe who has the
power. The audience sees that the nuns eat in reverent silence at dinner,
drinking only milk. The priests have a sumptuous meal, accompanied by alcoholic
drinks, cigarettes, and raucous laughter. When Father Flynn is in the
principal’s office, he sits at her chair, usurping her authority. She must
serve him tea, although she admits she is rusty at doing so. Sister Aloysius
tries to protect one of the older nuns who she is afraid will be banished
supposedly to some retirement home by the male hierarchy if her developing
blindness is discovered.
Aloysius
knows the male chain of command, but she is now willing to go against it,
breaking rules she has upheld, in her crusade against the man who she is
convinced is guilty. When Father Flynn confronts her after he sees her with
Mrs. Miller, she basically says she has the goods on him. He has been at three
different parishes in the prior five years. She says she talked to a nun at his
prior assignment, and found out he has a history of improprieties. He was the
one who didn’t want the Catholic Church to dwell in the Dark Ages, and appeared
to be a reformer in terms of wanting secular songs at Christmas and breaking
down barriers between clergy and parishioners. But, he now becomes the one who
defends the system and she appears as the rebel. He plays the church male
dominance card, telling her that she should have talked to the pastor, not a
nun. He says, “You have no right to act on your own. You have taken vows,
obedience being one! You answer to us! You have no right to step outside the
church!” But, she is willing to do just that at this point. She says, “I will
step outside the church if that’s what needs to be done … though I’m damned to
hell!” He says that she has no proof. She says she has her “certainty.” She
promises to be relentless, going to families to expose his sins. He realizes
that he is unable to stop her. He says that he can’t tell her everything. What
does he mean by that? Perhaps Flynn is gay, and he saw a child who suffered as
he did as a youth, and only wanted to show that he was not alone. Or, is he on
the verge of confessing that he did give the boy the wine to make it easier to
seduce him? In any event, Aloysius is able to get him to leave without making a
public scandal, thus protecting Donald.
At
the end of the film, Sister James, after returning from caring for her ill
brother, talks with Sister Aloysius in that same church garden. She says that
although Flynn is gone, the male power structure has promoted him, making him a
pastor at his next parish. She admits now that she made no such call to a nun
at a prior parish. She lied in order to, she believes, get at the truth. The
ends justified the means. She says that her lie would have had no force if the
priest was not guilty. “His resignation was his confession,” she tells Sister
James. But, is it? In a sermon about gossip, Father Flynn gave an analogy to a
pillow being ripped and the feathers flying everywhere, impossible to be
gathered up once released. The lie takes on a life of its own, as it did in the
Salem Witch Trials, as it did during the period of McCarthyism. Maybe Flynn
realized that proving there was a lie was harder than Aloysius proving there
was a crime.
The
next film is Who’s Afraid of Virginia
Woolf?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your thoughts about the movies discussed here.