SPOILER ALERT! The plot of
the movie will be discussed.
The opening credits appear
over men and women dancing in turn-of-the-20th-century clothes to The Merry Widow Waltz by Franz Lehar. The
image is one of a civilized society surrounded by lively music. It appears
other times in the film, as does the melody, and it becomes an ironic contrast
as the news about the killer known as The Merry Widow Murderer becomes known. Within
the killer’s nickname we have an ironic contrast embodied in one entity,
emphasized by the music, of happiness and death. The first scene has the camera
expose the seediness of an urban environment. We see derelict men on the ground
next to an illegal dump site. The story presents an East versus West theme,
which American literature uses as a motif in many works, most notably in The Great Gatsby, which emphasizes the
two sides of American life. In this
movie, there is the outward corruption of the East compared with the pretty
California town of Santa Rosa. From a religious viewpoint, the movie contrasts
the fallen nature of the urban with the Edenic life of a small town.
The first glimpse of Uncle Charlie (Joseph
Cotton), a deceptively sweet name, shows him stretched out on a bed in a
cramped rented room. There is money on a piece of furniture and on the floor.
The landlady comes in saying that two men are asking for the reclining man.
When she goes to the window and closes the blind, bathing the man in darkness,
he bolts upright and into action. The effect makes one think of a vampire who
was sleeping in a coffin, waking up when the light cannot expose his dangerous
nature. Later, Jack Graham (Macdonald Carey) asks the young Ann (Edna May
Wanacott) to tell the story of Dracula. And Uncle Charlie says to his niece, his
namesake, Charlie (Teresa Wright) that “the same blood runs through our veins,”
highlighting the food on which the vampire feeds. The vampire appears like a
non-threatening human, but is really a creature that drains life out of its
victim, and then turns its prey into one of its own kind, in a way subverting
the nature of the person it attacks.
When we first see young Charlie,
she is in bed, just like her Uncle. The images suggest the contrast between his
depravity and her innocence. But, it is more complex than that. She is bored
with her life and wants some excitement, and comes up with the idea that a
visit from Uncle Charlie is just what she needs. At the same time, Uncle
Charlie has given the two men, who are police officers, the slip, and decides
to visit his sister’s family out west. These two are, thus, linked by genetics
and name, and possibly psychologically. Charlie even says at one point that
they are like twins. The double is often used in horror stories to show the
good and bad sides of the same person. So, the dark side of Charlie yearns for
the danger embodied in her uncle.
In a way, Uncle Charlie shows
a cynical viewpoint that sees corruption in everything. But, by doing so, he exposes
the latent decay in even supposedly good-natured small town existence. When at
the bank where Charlie’s father, Mr. Newton (Henry Travers), works, Uncle
Charlie makes jokes about embezzlement, which causes Mr. Newton and other
employees to become nervous. Uncle Charlie says, “We all know what banks are.
Look alright to an outsider, but no one knows what goes on when the doors are
locked. Can’t fool me, though.” He, being evil, can see where evil lurks. He
points out that the head of the bank, the appropriately named Mr. Green (Edwin
Stanley), will probably lose his job to his brother-in-law, revealing that the affable
Mr. Newton may have a ruthless, ambitious side. Later, Uncle Charlie questions
the effectiveness of religion, and implies derision toward followers, when he shows
surprise that a church service was fully attended, saying, “That show’s been
running such a long time. I thought attendance may be falling off.” That there
is a darkness underneath the happy surface here can be seen in the
conversations between Mr. Newton and friend Herbie (Hume Cronyn, in his film
debut). They play at a game of presenting various ways murderers carry out
their deeds. Herbie says he put soda in their coffee, which could have been
poison, for instance. Mr. Newton seems to favor the more direct approach, using
blunt instruments. But, Herbie says that a crafty killer will be subtler. He
could be talking about Uncle Charlie. In any event, it is a disturbing back-and-forth
between the two in a supposedly non-threatening world.
We learn that Charlie is very
bright, so it is no surprise she learns about her uncle’s secret. She is at
first enthusiastic about his visit. However, she senses that he is hiding something.
It is only later that she has a “shadow of a doubt” about his true nature. He
gives her an emerald ring (something he took from one of the widows he killed),
but she notices it contains an inscription to someone else. Uncle Charlie
covers up this discovery by saying the jeweler fooled him. He hides a newspaper
clipping which Charlie pulls out of his pocket, thinking that it will point to
his secret, but not suspecting anything threatening. Uncle Charlie turns from
Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde, telling her the news article is none of her business,
and hurting her arm while grabbing it. Two men arrive stating that they are
making a photographic study of a typical American family, and they want to
include the Newtons as part of their project. There is an attraction between
Charlie and one of the men, Jack Graham. When he questions how quickly she
turned from being depressed and bored to feeling excited after her uncle
arrived, she becomes defensive, asking if he is implying that Uncle Charlie
isn’t as wonderful as she described. She actually is voicing her own doubts
about her uncle.
Graham reveals that he is a
detective, and that her uncle is one of their suspects in The Merry Widow
Murderer case. He concedes that there is another man they are following in the
eastern states. They took pictures as part of their charade so as to have
witnesses back east identify Uncle Charlie. He tried to take the film, saying
he didn’t like being photographed, but the men switched the film. Graham
convinces Charlie to work undercover for him. So, she must now employ a sham
façade, and break rules, as she did when going to the library after hours to
learn about the newspaper story her uncle hid. It appears that the situation
requires that she fight fire with fire.
Uncle Charlie makes a
disturbing misogynistic speech at the dinner table about widows. He says that
there are many dead husbands who slaved their lives away making money that
their widows now enjoy. These “silly” wives go to the best hotels, “drinking
the money, eating the money, losing the money at bridge.” He calls them
“horrible, faded, fat, greedy women.” Charlie rushes out of the house, and her
uncle pursues her. (There is an ironic statement from Uncle Charlie to the
local policeman who tells Uncle Charlie that his niece should watch how she
ruses into traffic, and must obey the laws. He says we “wouldn’t want to break
the law”). He forces her into a bar to talk. The sleaziness of the place is
another example of underlying decay even in an upstanding community. The
waitress, a former fellow student of Charlie’s, appears world-weary, having
been around the block, so to speak, several times, and she is surprised someone
like Charlie would show up there. Uncle Charlie is symbolic of how the darker
“twin” part of Charlie can steer her into the wrong side of life. She knows
from the news story that the inscription of the ring matches the name of one of
The Merry Widow Murderer victims. He reveals his ugly view of the world, saying
she is basically naïve. He tells her, “You live in a dream. You’re a
sleepwalker, blind. How do you know what the world is like? Do you know the
world is a foul sty? Do you know, that if you rip off the fronts of the houses,
you’d find swine? The world’s a hell. What does it matter what happens in it?”
Admitting that he is the culprit, he asks her to let him leave, so as not to
destroy her mother emotionally once the news gets out.
It turns out that the other
suspect was killed while trying to escape police, and Graham says that Uncle
Charlie, thus, is not the killer. Her uncle now feels as if he is in the clear,
so he decides to stay. But, he feels that Charlie is a threat to him while she
lives. He weakens a step outside so she will fall, but Charlie grabs hold of a
railing, escaping serious injury. He also prevents Charlie from escaping the
carbon monoxide-filled garage caused by a running car; she survives because
Herbie heard her screams as he approached the house. When Uncle Charlie tells
Graham how precious his niece is, he holds her face in an almost suffocating
manner, undermining the expressed sentiment.
Uncle Charlie does decide to
leave after Charlie’s survival. On the departing train, we see Mrs. Potter, who
he met at the bank. She is another rich widow, who would probably be his next
victim. Charlie is on the train, but her uncle prevents her from leaving as the
train starts to move away from the station. He tries to push her off, but she
reverses their positions, and it is Uncle Charlie who topples out, into the
path of an oncoming train. In a way, this scene symbolizes Charlie conquering
the darker side of herself, and, ironically, the evil that arrived on a
serpent-like train, now is destroyed leaving on one.
At the end, Graham and
Charlie decide not to expose Uncle Charlie’s demonic deeds, believing it would
be too difficult for the family and the community to be exposed to such horror.
They plan to be together, which is optimistic, but the ugly hatred of the world
that Uncle Charlie embraced haunts her.
The next film is Up in the Air.
Nice review. Lots of telling details. Loved this film. Like the aspects of human nature it exposes, it is timeless.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments.
ReplyDeleteBrilliantly done! This "close reading," as I believe it is called ,gave me a lesson on how to write this type of analysis. Sure wish I had seen this while taking an "Explication de text" French class at university!
ReplyDeleteBrilliantly done! This "close reading," as I believe it is called ,gave me a lesson on how to write this type of analysis. Sure wish I had seen this while taking an "Explication de text" French class at university!
ReplyDelete